{"id":6878,"date":"2016-10-18T13:01:12","date_gmt":"2016-10-18T10:01:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/?p=6878"},"modified":"2018-07-05T15:02:56","modified_gmt":"2018-07-05T12:02:56","slug":"yali-atakoy-arazi-davasi-sonuclandi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/?p=6878","title":{"rendered":"Yal\u0131 Atak\u00f6y arazi davas\u0131 sonu\u00e7land\u0131!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Atak\u00f6y\u2019de 16 katl\u0131 5 blo\u011fun y\u00fckseldi\u011fi arazi hakk\u0131nda 6 y\u0131ld\u0131r s\u00fcren dava sonu\u00e7land\u0131. \u201cYe\u015fil alan\u0131n betonla\u015fma riski\u201d konusunda yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lacak.<\/p>\n<div class=\"centerAd\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"clear\"><\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Atak\u00f6y sahilde gelir payla\u015f\u0131m y\u00f6ntemiyle \u00a0TOK\u0130\u00a0 taraf\u0131ndan ihaleyle verilen arsaya 16 katl\u0131 5 blok in\u015fa edildi. Ancak bu ihaleye \u2018ye\u015fil alan\u0131n betonla\u015fma tehlikesi var\u2019 gerek\u00e7esiyle Atak\u00f6y Derne\u011fi\u2019nce 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Yerel mahkemenin ehliyet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddetti\u011fi davada Dan\u0131\u015ftay s\u00fcreci 6 y\u0131lda tamamland\u0131.<\/p>\n<div class=\"habericirek\"><\/div>\n<p>Arazi i\u00e7indeki t\u00fcm a\u011fa\u00e7lar kesilip b\u00f6lgedeki bina tamamland\u0131ktan sonra yarg\u0131, Atak\u00f6y 1. K\u0131s\u0131m Koruma ve G\u00fczelle\u015ftirme Derne\u011fi\u2019ni hakl\u0131 buldu. \u015eimdi 16 katl\u0131 5 blo\u011fun y\u00fckseldi\u011fi arazi hakk\u0131nda \u201cye\u015fil alan\u0131n betonla\u015fma riski\u201d konusunda yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lacak.<\/p>\n<p>TOK\u0130 Atak\u00f6y sahilde 564 Ada 161 \u2013 162 parseli arsa kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 gelir payla\u015f\u0131m y\u00f6ntemiyle 31 A\u011fustos 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda ihaleye \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. \u00d6zyaz\u0131c\u0131 \u0130n\u015faat \u2013 Karadeniz \u00d6rme ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 447 milyon 150 bin lira bedelle ald\u0131. Atak\u00f6y 1. K\u0131s\u0131m Koruma G\u00fczelle\u015ftirme Derne\u011fi ihalenin iptali i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul 4. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Arazinin ye\u015fil alan konumunda oldu\u011fu, betonla\u015fma tehlikesi bulundu\u011funu belirtti. Ancak mahkeme sat\u0131\u015f i\u015fleminin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fal sonucu gerek\u00e7esiyle davay\u0131 ehliyet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddetti. B\u00f6ylelikle tam 6 y\u0131l s\u00fcrecek bir hukuk m\u00fccadelesi ba\u015flad\u0131.<\/p>\n<h2>MAHKEMELER ARASI TRAF\u0130K<\/h2>\n<p>Dernek, karar\u0131 Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u2019a ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131. Dan\u0131\u015ftay 13. Daire, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda derne\u011fi hakl\u0131 bularak dosyay\u0131 mahkemesine g\u00f6nderdi. Yerel mahkeme karar\u0131nda direndi. Dernek hukuk m\u00fccadelesinde pes etmeyerek yeni karar\u0131 Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu\u2019na ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131. Bu kez kurul, derne\u011fi hakl\u0131 bularak emsal bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f bildirdi ve davan\u0131n ehliyet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine ili\u015fkin mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu. TOK\u0130 bu karara da itiraz ederek d\u00fczeltme istedi. Hukuk y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bu son hamlede yeterli olmad\u0131. Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulu, \u201ckarar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen hususlar yasa maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden hi\u00e7birisine uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u2019\u2019 belirterek karar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi istemini reddetti.<\/p>\n<h2>SAH\u0130L ELDEN G\u0130TT\u0130<\/h2>\n<p>Mahkemeler aras\u0131ndaki uzun s\u00fcrecin ard\u0131ndan Dan\u0131\u015ftay karar\u0131yla yeniden yarg\u0131lama \u00e7\u0131ksa da bug\u00fcn ortada ne ye\u015fil alan ne sahil k\u0131y\u0131s\u0131 mevcut. Daval\u0131 arsada 16 katl\u0131 5 blok y\u00fckseldi ve arazi i\u00e7indeki t\u00fcm a\u011fa\u00e7lar kesildi. Mahkeme usulden bozdu\u011fu davay\u0131 6 y\u0131l sonra esastan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fecek. Bilirki\u015fi g\u00f6nderip ke\u015fif yapt\u0131racak.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 iptal etti\u011fi takdirde Atak\u00f6y Yal\u0131 Marine projesi kad\u00fck duruma d\u00fc\u015fecek. Bu durumda y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 da olas\u0131. B\u00f6yle bir durumda t\u0131pk\u0131 \u0130stanbul\u2019un tarihi siluetini bozan 16:9 kuleleri gibi Atak\u00f6y sahilde de siyasi iradenin karar\u0131 uygulamas\u0131 beklenecek.<\/p>\n<h2>AYNI \u015eEY HEP YAPILIYOR<\/h2>\n<p>Avukat Eren Can kararla ilgili \u015f\u00f6yle konu\u015ftu: \u201cBu kararla yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lacak. Mahkeme esastan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmek zorunda. Haliyle ke\u015fif yapacak. \u0130ddialar\u0131n hepsi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f ise sat\u0131\u015f iptali verecek. Belki de y\u0131k\u0131m karar\u0131 alacak. Ancak bu durumla \u00e7ok s\u0131k kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131yoruz. Yarg\u0131lamalar uzun s\u00fcr\u00fcyor ve projeler bu a\u015famada bitmi\u015f oluyor. \u0130\u00e7inden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lmaz bir hale geliyor. Ayn\u0131 \u015fey 3. k\u00f6pr\u00fcde de ya\u015fand\u0131. Karar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 ama bu s\u0131rada k\u00f6pr\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. Yine Mecidiyek\u00f6y eski lik\u00f6r fabrikas\u0131 arazisine yap\u0131lan in\u015faatlarda ayn\u0131 durumda.\u2019\u2019<\/p>\n<p>H\u00fcrriyet<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Atak\u00f6y\u2019de 16 katl\u0131 5 blo\u011fun y\u00fckseldi\u011fi arazi hakk\u0131nda 6 y\u0131ld\u0131r s\u00fcren dava sonu\u00e7land\u0131. \u201cYe\u015fil alan\u0131n betonla\u015fma riski\u201d konusunda yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lacak. Atak\u00f6y sahilde gelir payla\u015f\u0131m y\u00f6ntemiyle \u00a0TOK\u0130\u00a0 taraf\u0131ndan ihaleyle verilen arsaya 16 katl\u0131 5 blok in\u015fa edildi. Ancak bu ihaleye \u2018ye\u015fil alan\u0131n betonla\u015fma tehlikesi var\u2019 gerek\u00e7esiyle Atak\u00f6y Derne\u011fi\u2019nce 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Yerel mahkemenin ehliyet [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6879,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[221,26],"tags":[11088,81,272,4289,11273,73,4474,4288,4287],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6878"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6878"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6878\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6884,"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6878\/revisions\/6884"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6879"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emlaktuel.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}